But the most important thing is to make sure if the site is a scam or not before paying the registration fee. To know if the site is legitimate, you can look for Rona Proof. Most of the people have positive reviews for Rona Proof Masterclass. Individuals you have attended the online virtual classes of Anthony Robinson can make successful deals within a short period.
Those who have attended the classes have praised Tony gives all the techniques and strategies. The Rona Proof. The only highlighting con of this website is that the webinar which is to be held on 24th May is only available for limited. It will be based on come first and service first. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Website Reviews. Alexis Alden May 22, November 5, no comment No tags. Table of Contents. No Comment. After reading the reviews within the Rona Proff content, I am sold on taking the master class. Getawaydealz Legit [May] Safe to Buy or not? You Might Also Like. Alexis Alden January 10, January 10, As DevOps is becoming popular within The Department of Education remains focused in pushing for reforms in the education system in line with the point education agenda of the former President Benigno S.
Among the much talked about issues these days is K to 12, a program that will extend the basic education cycle from the current 10 years to the proposed 12 years. Keeping with the international norm is merely one of the minor rationalizations for the additional two years.
Instead, the overarching objective is to improve the quality of students that our schools produce. It will allow us to spread learning better and not cram a 12 year Curriculum in just 10 years. It will also strengthen the inherent skills and talents of our students that will prime them for employment after graduation.
An integral part of the program is developing a curriculum that will support the expanded basic education cycle. Also part of the K to 12 program is the institutionalization of universal kindergarten in all public schools nationwide and the use of mother tongue as the medium of instruction for earlier grades. Through K to 12, high school graduates will have the competency and the skills to be gainfully employed by reputable employers. Under the new program, basic education starts with kindergarten, six years of elementary education, four years of junior high school Grade 7 to 10 and two years of senior high school Grade 11 to The two years of senior high school will enable students to consolidate acquired academic skills and competencies.
It is to inform the readers that this education curriculum has an advantages and disadvantages. The government allocated huge budget for this program. K Education Program Advantages: Employment-a student can apply for a work after senior high school since he has already skills to use in working such as AutoCad, computer hardware servicing, dressmaking, cooking, etc. Entrepreneurship-well, in K program, a student can teach entrepreneurship.
He will obtain an information about entrepreneurial skills. A student after senior high school will decide to start his own business rather than looking for a job. Higher Level of Education-this is true since we added two years for education curriculum. There were questions if the K to 12 is the solution to poverty, we can say yes, we can also say no.
The government helps us to make our students skillful. However, it is not advisable to rely only to the government assistance. Why not teach your kids on how to learn entrepreneurship, start his own business rather than looking for a job. Additional to entrepreneurship, why not teach your kids financial literacy?
What is meant by financial literacy? By knowing how to save and invest for the future, you and your whole family can prosper in this life. And for me, financial literacy and entrepreneurship is the solution for poverty and unemployment. There are so much things you should know about K Whatever the education curriculum implemented, it is your choice whether you will adapt the old mindset whereas an individual will look for a job after graduation.
If every one of us are looking for a job, what will happen? But, if however at least 1 out of 50 students, there will be an entrepreneur? That means that individual will provide a job for 49 people. In K, it is very possible. The implementation of K curriculum in the country drew negative reactions from various societal groups. Since , critics have been very vocal on their primary concerns. Despite calls to suspend the program, the government remained firm saying this new educational system offers opportunities for Filipino students and the national economy.
For its part, the Department of Education DepEd stresses that the country is prepared for a big shift in education system. In fact, it has worked to fulfill the gaps on the number of classrooms, teachers, and textbooks.
Also, it has finished the planning phases along with stakeholders. But what does K scheme really has to offer to students? This is an advantage, according to DepEd, as graduates will be considered young adults. Hence, they will be more equipped to deal with much higher level of learning as they enter college education. Readiness to join the workforce—unlike the old system, K does not compel each student to take college after completing Senior High School SHS. In fact, this scheme empowers students to make a choice on their own.
They may not pursue college education especially if they have chosen a track other than academic track. The good thing is SHS graduates will be equipped with skills through electives that will make them good at certain field s. With the new curriculum, DepEd promised to offer higher quality education through tracks. Each track will give students enough time to master a field and enhance their skills.
In the end, K graduates will become globally competitive and are set to obtain spot in the stiff labor market. The government believes that K to 12 curriculum in the Philippines will put Filipino students at par with the rest of the world.
Truly, investing in education is the key toward reaching national growth and development. One reason is that students do not get adequate instructional time or time on task.
In the mathematics exam, for example, we came in dead last. Our graduates are not automatically recognized as professionals abroad. DepEd must first solve the lack of classrooms, furniture and equipment, qualified teachers, and error-free textbooks. Why do we have to follow what the rest of the world is doing?
We are better than all of them. Filipinos right now are accepted in prestigious graduate schools in the world, even with only ten years of basic education. The problem is the content, not the length, of basic education.
As an editorial put it, we need to have better education, not more education. The drop-out rate will increase because of the two extra years. In fact, as far as I can see, they have refused to even listen to the government. What we need are objective, actual empirical cost-benefit and pedagogical studies to support or debunk the claims of either side. The disadvantages of the K program are the lack of classrooms and the bloating of the curriculum - you simply stretched the 10 years of the current curriculum to 12 years of curriculum - there is no improvement in content - and lack of teachers.
There are no advantages. An extra 2 years deprives a family of income in a society where the issue of poverty has not been addressed. If I may add, there is no disadvantage today. Most of those who finish college will find that they need massive corporate training to keep up with the demands of professional life.
In technical fields, you might be slow but you will learn as you go along. One cannot be thoroughly prepared in 10 or 12 years of education. The goal of education in the Philippines must be defined. Does the Philippines want to become like the United States as a technology center?
Unless there is something compelling it may take another generation to surpass the United States. Learning in the United States has one simple principle: access to many fields of interests through a multitude of media, and experts available to help kids in high school.
These are the better issues to address now. Without a significant transformation of the support needed for kids to attain excellence, K is just a waste of time. We do realize that there are many college graduates who are launched quite early in the employment game and they are often without jobs.
But this all the more argues for the strategy that the employment problem must be resolved. K graduates will only face the same problem. It is indispensable that the basic education curriculum be a seamless and coordinated whole taking into account the different terminal goals of a graduate—work, entrepreneurship, and higher education. DepEd has created a steering committee to undertake the complicated mandate of putting in the details in the K framework it has initially established.
The Technical Working Group, comprised of representatives from the three different agencies, met but since the first meetings have not yet met again because of logistics-related concerns and an unquestionable problem on coordination. This poses an insurmountable problem in the eventual implementation of the policy considering that what the K envisions is a well-coordinated, well-thought out, seamless and integrated basic education curriculum that equips the graduate for work, technical education, or higher education.
If TESDA and CHED would be left out in the planning and curriculum formulation, there is a great likelihood that the curriculum will not feed in seamlessly to either technical education or higher education. Isagani Cruz, an education expert, noted that changing the curriculum is a daunting task.
To date, there has been no proclamation yet of any finalized K basic education curriculum. This missing element will create a spill over problem with the target implementation for next year. The curriculum still has to be subjected to serious evaluation and pilot testing in order to test its effectiveness and viability. The target date of initial implementation for next year will not be plausible. There appears to be a structural failure in the three agencies 76 K Education Reform which impedes the advancing of curriculum design.
Unless this problem on coordination is addressed, at most, only DepEd will have the full hand in the formulation. According to DepEd a , the K program would require , more teachers. Even without the new program, there is already a shortage of teachers due to budget constraints. Hiring more in preparation for the implementation of K will be met with even more difficulties. From the point of view of the private education institutions, an identified concern is the loading of some teachers in the tertiary level, especially those assigned to handle general education courses, once the two years of senior high school are already implemented.
Since there will be two years, during the transition phase, that there will be no freshmen in the tertiary level, some general education college teachers will then have to be given teaching load in the senior high school. These teachers who will be given assignments in the senior high school cannot just do so without the adequate training. The question of which education agency will administer the implementation of the senior high school is also crucial as it will define certain key aspects such as professional requirements for teachers.
This then, will create a problem among schools, colleges, and universities who will laterally transfer their tertiary level general education teachers to teach in the senior high school. This is particularly true since, in college, a license to teach is not a requirement. Still another area that merits attention and careful study is the training of teachers who will execute the changes in the curriculum of basic education in conformity with the K program. It has been noted in various studies that the poor professional and academic preparation of teachers is one of the reasons the quality of education in the Philippines suffers.
Such a problem has been receiving a lot of attention and intervention from DepEd as well as from some private organizations but the improvement is still largely to be seen. Apart from the additional training for teachers who will handle senior high schools, there is also a corollary requirement to reevaluate the curriculum for the teaching profession.
Needless to say, the reformulation of the teacher curriculum shall have to be addressed once a new K curriculum has already been finalized.
Proposals have been made in anticipation of the problem on needed infrastructure to support the K program. One viable option is to allow private schools to provide the needed infrastructure to the government by financing private education of those students who can no longer be accommodated by public schools due to their physical limitations. Because Platelets have just a five day shelf life, it is important that donations be made every day to ensure a fresh and ample supply. Platelet donations made during these critical periods will earn an additional 75 Advantage points:.
Frequent donors can earn Advantage bonus points each calendar year. Make at least four donations, of any kind, and you will earn 75 bonus points. Each automated red cell donation Alyx will count as two donations toward your calendar year bonus. When you are ready to redeem you'll see a wide array of gift and gift card choices beginning at points.
You may redeem all or some of your points as you wish.
0コメント